They say they do.
So why give the party that is out of power "equal time" after a presidential speech? Who the frak watches them, anyway? I don't watch them, I never have, and I don't remember anyone, other than a political junkie or a reporter, ever saying they watched the rebuttal speech.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Jindal showed why equal time is a good thing. His speech reinforced my view that Obama has an idea of how to get out of this mess, the the "Party of Hoover' can only respond by saying 'tax cuts'. If the (R)s keep up like this, we may have almost all the seats in both houses in 2012
ReplyDeleteHa! You make a good point. If the Republicans truly don't like the idea behind the fairness doctrine, they should have turned down the chance to rebut The President's speech last night.
ReplyDeleteThen, again, Marc makes a good point. Let them keep talking. The more rope to hang themselves with and all that.