Would someone please explain why two neo-Nazi skinhead morons (OK, the second and third terms are redundant) who planned to steal guns, kill 88 Black people and then try to kill Barack Obama would not be labeled as "terrorists?"
Some pizza delivery dudes who shot their mouths off about going into Ft. Bragg and killing soldiers are "terrorists," but not these two guys. The words "terrorist" or "terrorism" are not in the article. Or this one. Not in any of the ones I looked at.
I guess you have to be a Muslim to be considered to be a "terrorist" these days.
No comments:
Post a Comment
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.