Monday, February 18, 2008

Shooting Down a Satellite

Is there anybody at all, outside of the Bush Administration and their gullible Kool-Aid quaffing sycophants, who think that shooting down this satellite is anything other than an excuse to test an ASAT weapon? At the end of January, the Bush Administration was saying that the risk of damage or injury from the satellite was "minimal."

I don't buy that they all of a sudden concluded that the hydrazine tank posed a severe threat.

What I do buy is that someone told Bush that this would be a great opportunity to shoot off a missile to test an ABM interceptor. And he seized on it.

So what this is, again, is yet another Bush lie encased in a veneer of plausibility.

1 comment:

  1. I'm familiar with the four horsemen of the apocalypse,I had just never been warned about a dangerous moron riding a jackass known as "Teh Stoopidz".

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.