The Trump administration has urged Romanian authorities to lift travel restrictions on influencer Andrew Tate and his brother, Tristan Tate, as they await trial on charges including human trafficking, sexual misconduct, and money laundering, according to a report by the Financial Times.
The 37-year-old is currently under house arrest in Romania and is awaiting trial on human trafficking charges. His brother, 36, and two Romanian women are also awaiting trial.
Interesting how the Mango Mussolini is standing up for a couple of clowns who are accussed of human trafficking, which, coincidentally, is one of the very crimes that he accuses mogrants of perpetuating.
I don’t even think you believe half of what you post. You do understand Andrew was doing whatever you think he does for years until he spoke out against the government and suddenly he was illegal ?
ReplyDeleteNo, I don't understand that and neither do you. Andrew probably figured that his Orange Buddy would pull his ass out of the fire and so...
DeleteSo you don’t question government unless Trump is in charge?
DeleteEveryone who speaks out against should not be silenced. On either side.
DeleteNo, it sounds as though you're arguing that if someone is pro-Trump, their alleged crimes should be given a pass.
DeleteNo one should be illegally prosecuted. That is a losing battle
DeleteWho has been illegally prosecuted?
DeletePlease star the probable cause against Trump in any case
DeleteFirst, a disclaimer--I'm not a lawyer and have no legal expertise, but here goes.
Delete1. Classified Documents case: The FBI raid turned up classified documents that allegedly should not have been in Trump's possession. The raid came after months of negotiations between Trump's people and gov't officials to return the documents. Have the documents been returned? (Note: When Biden, Pence and others were found to have classified documents, they immediately cooperated and returned the documents.
2. Georgia Fake Electors case: While Trump's call to the GA Sec. of State ("I just want to find 11,780 votes") got most of the media attention, the paper-, email- and text-trail between Trump's team to allegedly attempt to put fake electors in place of the real electors due to "rigged election," provided the real probable cause behind this case, enough so that it would be hard to not suspect Trump was involved to some extent. A trial might have clarified his involvement.
3.NY Hush Money case: Correct me if I'm wrong, but in NY, a grand jury determines whether probable cause exists to pursue prosecution with an indictment. Trump went through the grand jury process like any other person of interest. I wasn't privy to all the information the NY grand jury used to indict Trump (I'm guessing you weren't either), but they did. And remember, Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts. Trump's legal team couldn't find one juror to waiver on any of the charges let alone all of them to get him off.
That's enough for now.
As a reader of this blog for years I have never seen her question the government until January 20 of this year , except for all the times she did. Also, all of the January 6 insurrectionists were only arrested because they supported Trump not because they attacked the Capitol Police and trashed the Capitol Building. And the priors some have were only noted because they were Trump supporters.
ReplyDelete(This is sarcasm.)