Monday, March 21, 2016

Stun Guns are Legal, Maybe

In a "per curiam" opinion, the Court hinted that Massachusetts' ban on stun guns is illegal. Pity that they didn't outright strike it down, but I imagine the cards are favoring that; you can read the opinion. It's not very long.

But having a gun in your car when you park in the post office parking lot isn't, at least in the states that make up the 10th Circuit.

Anyway, a unanimous "per curiam" opinion is a very polite way of writing to the loser with a salutation of: "Dear Fucking Idiot". Which might leave a mark on the MA Supreme Judicial Court. Maybe their chief judge had other things on his mind.

(H/T)

1 comment:

  1. I like the bit about the first amendment protecting electronic speech and the second amendment protecting electronic weapons.

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.