Monday, May 10, 2010

Kagan to the Supreme Court?

President Obama is going to nominate Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court.

I think this is a bad pick. Kagan doesn't strike me as being very progressive. Why in the name of (insert name of your favorite deity here) is he not pushing the envelope on this one? In the next Congress, Obama would have a problem getting the Republicans to approve anyone to the left of Torquemada; this is his last shot for at least two years at getting in a game-changer on the Supreme Court. There are four solid fascist/corporatist conservative votes on the Court as it is; the idea of nominating someone who seems attracted to the idea of "if the President does it, it is per se legal" is something that I find troubling.

I'd like to see a justice who has had to run for a public office, served in the armed forces or who has worked in the private sector; anything that would give a potential justice some first-hand experience in what it means to have to hold down a job in this country. Kagan doesn't seem to be that justice.

5 comments:

  1. Please no one who has run for office and won.

    ReplyDelete
  2. he likes to play it safe and make people who would never vote for him happy for some reason.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bloody hell, you still think obama is progressive?

    He's authoritarian at heart, and she fits right in with that worldview.

    And the right thinks it's socialism they should be worried about, hah!


    Dave

    ReplyDelete
  4. I liked Nora Demleitner, the Dean of Hofstra Law School. For one thing, we were in college together, and I know something about her intelligence and ethics. For that reason, I don't want to submit her to the process.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dawn Johnsen would have been an excellent choice, I think. Of course, that means there's no way in hell Obama would nominate her.

    Kagan's been a good little enabler to Obama while she's been WH Counsel. That she seems to have no strong opinions of her own, including the idea that SCOTUS nominees should have strong opinions, I'm seriously unimpressed with her.

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.