Like Tupperware, but with lots of voltage.
I don't know about this, really. The laws on civilian use of deadly force are pretty easy to learn. Tasers, well, I doubt if there has been much either enacted or litigated on the civilian use of Tasers. If I were to be asked, I'd suggest that for now, you not shoot anyone with a Taser that you would not shoot with a .38.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, May 9, 2008
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Aw! But I was gonna get the pink one! And get a "Dora the Explorer:" one for my daughter!
ReplyDeleteI know saying this automatically puts me in the "not cool" list, but I really love Tasers.
ReplyDeleteWhen they were spanking new, people complained that they would be used in circumstances where lethal force was not justified. That is, people would be shot more than before, now that a less lethal option was available.
Well... that's kind of the point. Miles ahead of OC, which really kind of sucks at making people stop. And now we get cool guy toys like cameras and stuff attached?
Shotgun slugs too? The best invention ever, if you ask me...
Sure, occasionally bad things happen, but the odds of that are much lower than, say, skullcracking people with a PR-24.