A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu", that the 2020 election was stolen, or especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection, leave now.
Our suspicions are not bound by legalities, but they do provide a useful guide. In law, actions that imply a consciousness of guilt are not considered proof. But they do reinforce evidence, making it more persuasive.
In this case, hiding, shuffling, denying, redacting, scrubbing, all suggest a guilty mind. Not proof, but clear implication.
And you don't think that if that is true that the Biden admin wasn't eliminating all the other DNC types (and powerful RNC folks too) names and info from the lists? IF you think one you must surely think the other.
Neither admin has ever shown us the Customs forms from the Virgin Islands people that would have shown the visitors..
But I restate the question: please explain how he is "implicated"?
Yeah, yeah, more whataboutism to justify Trump's crimes. You do know, don't you, that claiming that your neighbor beats his wife doesn't get you off a charge of beating your wife.
Epstein's island was in US territory. Why would there be Customs forms?
With all the stories and photographs out there, the only way that you can not see that Trump is implicated with Epstein up to his neck is because you've closed your eyes, you've stopped up your ears and you're humming really loudly.
Implicate: 1. Show to be involved in a crime. 2.Bear some of the responsibility for an action or process, especially a crime. Trump was best buds with Epstein during his time of his preying on children. Some of the emails are out in the open especially that homemade birthday card. Even if he didn't participate (unlikely) he would have known what was going on.
"Whataboutism!!" is one of your fallbacks when you have lost the argument, innit? You still failed to address the point that if Trumps folks cold alter the Epstein files, Biden's folks could have as well. THat wasn't, BTY< "Whataboutism", just pointing out the facts.
And yes, you do have to pass through immigration and customs to enter the USVI. Show a drivers license (then) or a passport. Yet no one ever bothered to get those records...Odd
And so far all that anyone has produced is innuendo. Using your logic, we could indict and convict Hillary for a dozen murders...Innuendo isn't proof, it's false accusations and hope in your part. But your hopes keep getting dashed on the rocks of reality time after time.
Really? Biden didn't have so many FBI agents redacting Epstein stuff that the DoJ had to make videos to train them on what to do. That was all Your Guy's doing.
I will close this discussion by noting that you continually try to hold Democrats to a standard of conduct and proof that you don't seem to hold your own side to. Your man runs around like a demented toddler and you're just happy with all of that. Because you got your tax breaks, am I right?
Not defending here...
ReplyDeleteBut please explain how he is implicated?
Our suspicions are not bound by legalities, but they do provide a useful guide.
DeleteIn law, actions that imply a consciousness of guilt are not considered proof.
But they do reinforce evidence, making it more persuasive.
In this case, hiding, shuffling, denying, redacting, scrubbing, all suggest a guilty mind. Not proof, but clear implication.
Hope this helps.
It’s like Louis Armstrong said about Jazz, B. If you need an explanation you ain’t never gonna hear it.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet, if it is so obvious, why can't you tell me?
DeleteIt isn't like jazz. It's a set of facts that either exist or don't that you somehow are unable to articulate clearly. Should be simple. But you can't.
If he is implicated, then say how he is implicated.
Otherwise you are just dreaming.
Yeah, and the FBI hasn't had oodles of agents redacting Your Orange God's name from the Epstein files for funzies.
ReplyDeleteAnd you don't think that if that is true that the Biden admin wasn't eliminating all the other DNC types (and powerful RNC folks too) names and info from the lists? IF you think one you must surely think the other.
DeleteNeither admin has ever shown us the Customs forms from the Virgin Islands people that would have shown the visitors..
But I restate the question: please explain how he is "implicated"?
Yeah, yeah, more whataboutism to justify Trump's crimes. You do know, don't you, that claiming that your neighbor beats his wife doesn't get you off a charge of beating your wife.
DeleteEpstein's island was in US territory. Why would there be Customs forms?
With all the stories and photographs out there, the only way that you can not see that Trump is implicated with Epstein up to his neck is because you've closed your eyes, you've stopped up your ears and you're humming really loudly.
Implicate:
ReplyDelete1. Show to be involved in a crime.
2.Bear some of the responsibility for an action or process, especially a crime.
Trump was best buds with Epstein during his time of his preying on children. Some of the emails are out in the open especially that homemade birthday card. Even if he didn't participate (unlikely) he would have known what was going on.
On that last, one possible sub-caption:
ReplyDeleteSee no evil, hear no evil...
...and evil
"Whataboutism!!" is one of your fallbacks when you have lost the argument, innit? You still failed to address the point that if Trumps folks cold alter the Epstein files, Biden's folks could have as well. THat wasn't, BTY< "Whataboutism", just pointing out the facts.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, you do have to pass through immigration and customs to enter the USVI. Show a drivers license (then) or a passport. Yet no one ever bothered to get those records...Odd
And so far all that anyone has produced is innuendo. Using your logic, we could indict and convict Hillary for a dozen murders...Innuendo isn't proof, it's false accusations and hope in your part. But your hopes keep getting dashed on the rocks of reality time after time.
Really? Biden didn't have so many FBI agents redacting Epstein stuff that the DoJ had to make videos to train them on what to do. That was all Your Guy's doing.
DeleteI will close this discussion by noting that you continually try to hold Democrats to a standard of conduct and proof that you don't seem to hold your own side to. Your man runs around like a demented toddler and you're just happy with all of that. Because you got your tax breaks, am I right?
Doesn't matter.