Rupert Murdoch defiantly insisted on Tuesday he was not responsible for what he called "sickening and horrible invasions" of privacy committed by his company, claiming he had been betrayed by disgraceful unidentified colleagues and had known nothing of the cover-up of phone hacking.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Shorter Rupert Mudoch: "I Know Nothing, Nothing!"
Which was pretty much what he told Parliament:
4 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
For all his years, money and power, Rupert apparently doesn't know, understand or acknowledge the difference between "authority" and "responsibility."
ReplyDeleteHe was "betrayed by disloyal officers?"
ReplyDeleteWho "fought him at every turn?"
All that's missing is the ball bearings.
LRod
ZJX, ORD, ZAU retired
In a side note from left field, it's worth pointing out that Schultz's uber-commander, the guy with the monocle, was.....Jewish.
ReplyDeleteOh for the simple charms of the '60's and napalm in the morning.
Well, the actor who played Col. Klink was Jewish. Sort of like the actor who played Capt. Koloth was human. :)
ReplyDelete